Saturday, 17 October 2009

In(/out) sights – empirical research on the human right to essential medicines in Tanzania and Kenya.

For a change I’m not meant to post on the Advanced Legal Studies @ Westminster blog about philosophy. In fact I have been urged to reflect upon and disclose the empirical work I undertook during July and August 2009 in Tanzania and Kenya, as part of my PhD research on “The 'Human Right to Essential Medicines' in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Critique”.

First and foremost: it did happen. When I landed after a series of connection flights and met Emmanuel, my would-be ‘institutional host’, at the airport, I could not but shout out: “Emmanuel, is this really Dar es Salaam??” The fact is, I had been planning the trip for more than two years but I was caught in the bureaucratic limbo of getting a research permit from the competent Tanzania authority (COSTECH).

It did happen: I managed to conduct more than 50 relevant interviews about access to medicines, healthcare, human rights, with officials from the Tanzanian government (central and local), international organisations, non-governmental organisations, foreign aid etc. – the people with whom I exchanged emails now shaking my hand, laughing and openly talking with me.

It did happen, I managed to travel up-country, visiting the “rural areas where access to medicines is particularly deficient”, a formula I had used with exhaustion in the chapters of the thesis I had already written – and that now would manifest itself in sometimes Kafkaesque realities.

It did happen, I explored the Accredited Drugs Dispensing Outlets (ADDOs)/ Duka la Dawa Muhimu, the new Tanzanian project for access to quality medicines in underserved areas – the case study I had selected.

How did it happen? Background reading spanning books, journals, newspapers, any report written on health care and access to medicines in Tanzania; tracking down the people mentioned in those reports; participating at the meeting of the Tanzania society in London; working on contacts thence information thence contacts thence information. To be acknowledged, most important had been one contact, Emmanuel Alphonce. I met him as he was taking an MSc in Public Health in Leeds in 2007. He was TFDA ADDOs coordinator then and I interviewed him several times in Leeds and London. Now a manager at TFDA, he has become my institutional facilitator in the Authority, which provided me with essential organisational support. Quite exemplary, I came across Emmanuel in the first place through the combination of research and networks. He is friend to another friendly Tanzanian I met at Tanzanian President Kikwete’s visit to the Tanzanian diaspora in London. I had found out about the visit from the Tanzania High Commission website. Why had I visited the website? Why not?

So why did it happen? In fact, my thesis is mainly a theoretical enquiry. I examine international human rights law and utilise Luhmann’s theory of social systems ultimately to critically analyse the ethical implications of the “human right to healthcare and medicines” in Africa. The empirical side is nonetheless fundamental. And with the trip I was not merely investigating the context of health care in Tanzania and Kenya. Ethics is affections, languages, values, philosophies, the daily life. People. My empirical enquiry, in effect, lingered on another level. I was a traveller thence I could easily approach people. [Just as easily I could distance them. Excitement and compunction, travelling accelerates life.] During the interviews, I was methodically and voraciously asking precise, technical questions on various aspects of access to medicines. Yet, at the same time, I was undertaking a meta-research on what I could dub the anthropology of ‘access to medicines’, of medical care, of health policies – and more intimately an ‘anthropology’ of my encounters.

Thus the empirical work has operated in dialectic with the theoretical study. Apparently, I chose Luhmann’s social systems theory because of a certain perception of reality which was developed through academic research as well as life. The theory pre-existed this visit to Africa and helped me as a critical-analytical tool in appreciating the empirical findings. The trip, in turns, contributes to build on the theory. In sum, the dialectic is aimed at deconstructing the social systems and subsystems (e.g. the legal, political and moral subsystems), revealing the realities and subjectivities which are often demoted by the standardised communications of ‘access to medicines in Africa’. In the thesis I critically analyse and elaborate such in(/out)sights, problematising and paradoxifying the international ‘human right to essential medicines’.

In the pictures:
1) Travelling to Sumbawanga (Rukwa region, Tanzania), from Dar es Salaam to the westernmost border with Zambia.
2) Exploring village public dispensaries in the Sumbawanga municipality.
3) A Duka la Dawa Muhimu with its TFDA licensed shop-keeper in Kilombero district (Morogoro region, Tanzania).
Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, 13 October 2009

Philosophical Foundations of Law and Finance - 33rd Weekly Meeting

Dear all

For Friday 16 October 2009 the 33rd session of the Philosophical Foundations of Law and Finance will travel to the Latimer Conference Centre in Chalfont Latimer, Bucks, England.

From 6 to 7pm Joe will talk about “The 57 Principled Proposals of Global Financial Regulatory Reform”. The talk will be followed by drinks and dinner.

Please RSVP to Joe at joetanega@gmail.com.

Enjoy!

Joe and Laura
Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, 7 October 2009

Philosophical Foundations of Law and Finance - 32nd Weekly Meeting

Dear all


The 32nd research seminar on the Philosophical Foundations of Law & Finance warmly welcomes you this Friday, 9 October, at 6:00-8:00pm, in room 516, 309 Regent Street (University of Westminster).

Joe is particularly inspired about the agenda:

We shall review the basics of Aristotelian categoric logic -- potentiality and actuality, and the four causes--and then go directly to the apex of Aristotelian philosophy which is Book 12, part 9 of the Metaphysics (http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/metaphysics.12.xii.html ). We will do a close reading of "being" as the "unmoved mover". From this peak, much of the rest of philosophy is a slide downwards. So if you want to see what the greatest philosopher after Plato thought about the highest peak of consciousness and God, then this is the session to come to.

I take the occasion to advertise a forthcoming special event: the “Philosophic Foundations of Law and Finance Weekend Re-Treat.” The re-treat will take place in St Mawes, Cornwall, during the 13-15 November weekend. The programme includes walks (hikes or beach strolls), exquisite food, philosophy. Nice and interesting people sharing time together.

Transport costs by train are about £60 but it may be possible to get a group discount. With regard to the accommodation, Omar is arranging to rent a cottage from his boss: http://www.portscathoholidays.co.uk/stmawes/cottages/chupra#

The cottage has three bedrooms which sleep 7 people. However, we can arrange for extra beds. The cost for the cottage is contained. If more people want to join than the places available, other accommodation will be arranged. We apply a first come first served policy, so please email Omar for booking a place and for any further information (omar.a.khan@uk.bnpparibas.com). Please decide by this Friday, 9 October.

I look forward to seeing you all at the seminar!

Best wishes

Laura


Share/Bookmark

Monday, 5 October 2009

Lord Hunt's Review on the Regulation of Legal Services

(T shirt available here)

Monday 5 October 17:30 GMT: Lord Hunt of Wirral's review on the regulation of legal services is published. It can be downloaded here.

The review appears, according to Legal Week, to advocate greater self-regulation through "Authorised Internal Regulation" (AIR). This would initially apply to larger firms then extended to all firms. This should mean cheaper practising certificates.

The status of reserved areas could be extended to include claims handling, which would be one way of tackling the cowboys in this area.

In some ways the review harks back to earlier times of regulation. I wonder if that's realistic. Or if the time for this approach hasn't passed.

It should be an interesting debate.
Share/Bookmark

Saturday, 3 October 2009

Nine-year Old Injuncts Mining Company in Goa


My colleague, Radha D'Souza (see post below), brought this story in the MANDGoa blog to my attention.

A nine-year old village boy took a mining company to the High Court where he was successful in securing an injunction to stop the mining which could have destroyed the village.

Here is a brief extract from the interview with Aakash Naik, the boy:

GT: What do you feel will happen if the mining continues unhindered?

AN (Aakash Naik): The mining project, which has been stayed, would have destroyed Advalpal village, its fauna, natural heritage, water reservoirs like springs, wells, etc. However, had this project continued the entire village would have not have survived. So, in order to avoid this ill-effect it was my duty to stand against mining.


Share/Bookmark

Thursday, 1 October 2009

Radha D'Souza Discusses India's Maoists on Inside Story

Dr Radha D'Souza appears on Al Jazeera's Inside Story (29 September 2009) to discuss India's struggle with its Maoist insurgents.


Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, 29 September 2009

The Impact of Our Students' Research


(Thanks to politics.co.uk)

James Surowiecki, in the New Yorker, writes on business, the markets, and the economy. His article for September 21, 2009, concentrates on the power of credit rating agencies and the ways they are entangled in the financial regulatory system.

Of especial concern is the impact of a ratings downgrade. Surowiecki refers to a 2007 article in Business Week which describes how two mortgage-backed bonds were downgraded from AAA to CCC in a single day--a cataclysmic fall from top quality to junk.

Surowiecki goes on to say
As I mention in my column, one of the more curious aspects of the rating-agency controversy is that big investors, many of whom were arguably burned by the recent performance of the agencies, remain supportive of keeping them as regulatory gatekeepers. This study by academic Viktoria Baklanova explains why so many investors think the current system is superior to any that could replace it, and argues that the investors are right.
Viktoria is one our research students being supervised by Joe Tanega and myself. I'm sure her research on credit rating agencies will continue to have an impact and add to the discourse on their role in financial markets.
Share/Bookmark